<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Buhner Dot Com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.buhner.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.buhner.com</link>
	<description>Est. 2000, which is like 1947 in Internet years.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 00:00:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The 2012 Baseball Hall Of Fame Ballot &#8211; The Snubbed: Scott Erickson &amp; Rick Helling by rick James</title>
		<link>http://blog.buhner.com/2011/12/08/the-2012-baseball-hall-of-fame-ballot-the-snubbed-scott-erickson/comment-page-1/#comment-7083</link>
		<dc:creator>rick James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 00:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.buhner.com/?p=1030#comment-7083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although I consider Scott a nice guy, throwing
One no-hitter and on one All-Star team does not qualify for H.O.F.  it takes consistency over
The years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I consider Scott a nice guy, throwing<br />
One no-hitter and on one All-Star team does not qualify for H.O.F.  it takes consistency over<br />
The years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Royals Get James Shields, Play It &#8220;Safe&#8221; by C Riddle</title>
		<link>http://blog.buhner.com/2012/12/10/royals-get-james-shields-play-it-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-6820</link>
		<dc:creator>C Riddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.buhner.com/?p=1325#comment-6820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just about as articulate a response as I&#039;ve seen regarding this trade. Pretty much spot on. 

This trade was a hard one for me to swallow, since I&#039;m so high on Myers and I expect that Odorizzi will be at least a third starter (Montgomery is a wild card, here), and I get the whole &quot;bird in the hand&quot; way of looking at it. Still, Myers is going to be, in my humble opinion, HUGE. 

But then, I&#039;ve been wrong before:

Billy Ashley
JR Phillips
Emilio Bonifacio
Russell Branyan
Richie Sexson

And so on...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just about as articulate a response as I&#8217;ve seen regarding this trade. Pretty much spot on. </p>
<p>This trade was a hard one for me to swallow, since I&#8217;m so high on Myers and I expect that Odorizzi will be at least a third starter (Montgomery is a wild card, here), and I get the whole &#8220;bird in the hand&#8221; way of looking at it. Still, Myers is going to be, in my humble opinion, HUGE. </p>
<p>But then, I&#8217;ve been wrong before:</p>
<p>Billy Ashley<br />
JR Phillips<br />
Emilio Bonifacio<br />
Russell Branyan<br />
Richie Sexson</p>
<p>And so on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Your 2012 &#8220;If I had a Baseball HOF ballot&#8221; post Part 2 &#8211; The Rest by The 2013 Obligatory Baseball Hall Of Fame Ballot Post &#171; Buhner Dot Com</title>
		<link>http://blog.buhner.com/2012/01/09/your-2012-if-i-had-a-baseball-hof-ballot-post-part-2-the-rest/comment-page-1/#comment-6810</link>
		<dc:creator>The 2013 Obligatory Baseball Hall Of Fame Ballot Post &#171; Buhner Dot Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 21:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.buhner.com/?p=1087#comment-6810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Morris - See my comments about Morris last year, because they haven&#039;t changed. Like Finley before using clouded judgement remembering great catches [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Morris &#8211; See my comments about Morris last year, because they haven&#039;t changed. Like Finley before using clouded judgement remembering great catches [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bonds v. McGwire by The 2013 Obligatory Baseball Hall Of Fame Ballot Post &#171; Buhner Dot Com</title>
		<link>http://blog.buhner.com/2005/03/25/bonds-v-mcgwire/comment-page-1/#comment-6809</link>
		<dc:creator>The 2013 Obligatory Baseball Hall Of Fame Ballot Post &#171; Buhner Dot Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 21:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.buhner.com/?p=157#comment-6809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] McGwire - I wrote nearly eight years ago that I wasn&#039;t sure if McGwire was a Hall of Fame candidate even if performance-enhancing drugs were [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] McGwire &#8211; I wrote nearly eight years ago that I wasn&#039;t sure if McGwire was a Hall of Fame candidate even if performance-enhancing drugs were [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adderall, Baseball, and me by Dot</title>
		<link>http://blog.buhner.com/2012/11/28/adderall-baseball-and-me/comment-page-1/#comment-5903</link>
		<dc:creator>Dot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.buhner.com/?p=1291#comment-5903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got through the whole thing!  Very informative.  Good writing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got through the whole thing!  Very informative.  Good writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adderall, Baseball, and me by Judy Edwards</title>
		<link>http://blog.buhner.com/2012/11/28/adderall-baseball-and-me/comment-page-1/#comment-5849</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.buhner.com/?p=1291#comment-5849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found this to be a very good story and think you should send it to the major league so maybe they would understand it better and see how some of the fans feel,or aleast the Phillies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this to be a very good story and think you should send it to the major league so maybe they would understand it better and see how some of the fans feel,or aleast the Phillies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I Write (and why I don&#8217;t) by Jeremiah Graves</title>
		<link>http://blog.buhner.com/2012/05/16/why-i-write-and-why-i-dont/comment-page-1/#comment-5803</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah Graves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.buhner.com/?p=1259#comment-5803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hear ya, I have the same problem over at my sports site--which I won&#039;t reference by name b/c that feels like shameless promotion for a website that&#039;s rarely updated anymore--where I hate writing for an audience of no one.

With so many other great writers out there it always feels like my stuff is outdated or completely redundant by the time it gets posted. 

Stay strong, my brotha and keep pounding the keys. If you feel there&#039;s a story to write, write it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear ya, I have the same problem over at my sports site&#8211;which I won&#8217;t reference by name b/c that feels like shameless promotion for a website that&#8217;s rarely updated anymore&#8211;where I hate writing for an audience of no one.</p>
<p>With so many other great writers out there it always feels like my stuff is outdated or completely redundant by the time it gets posted. </p>
<p>Stay strong, my brotha and keep pounding the keys. If you feel there&#8217;s a story to write, write it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Yankee Pitcher Curse &#8211; Part 1: The Dawn Of Steinbrenner (1975-1981) by Why I Write (and why I don&#8217;t) &#171; Buhner Dot Com</title>
		<link>http://blog.buhner.com/2012/03/12/the-yankee-pitcher-curse-part-1-the-dawn-of-steinbrenner-1975-1981/comment-page-1/#comment-5802</link>
		<dc:creator>Why I Write (and why I don&#8217;t) &#171; Buhner Dot Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 13:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.buhner.com/?p=1247#comment-5802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] posted part one that Monday. Titled &quot;The Yankee Pitcher Curse - Part 1: The Dawn Of Steinbrenner (1975-1981)&quot;, it came in at 2610 words, which was still pretty huge and kind of gives you an idea of what this [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posted part one that Monday. Titled &quot;The Yankee Pitcher Curse &#8211; Part 1: The Dawn Of Steinbrenner (1975-1981)&quot;, it came in at 2610 words, which was still pretty huge and kind of gives you an idea of what this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Unintended Consequences by Dot</title>
		<link>http://blog.buhner.com/2012/03/05/unintended-consequences/comment-page-1/#comment-5788</link>
		<dc:creator>Dot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.buhner.com/?p=1241#comment-5788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good work, Tom.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good work, Tom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Opus by The Yankee Pitcher Curse &#8211; Part 1: The Dawn Of Steinbrenner (1975-1981) &#171; Buhner Dot Com</title>
		<link>http://blog.buhner.com/2012/02/29/the-opus-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5767</link>
		<dc:creator>The Yankee Pitcher Curse &#8211; Part 1: The Dawn Of Steinbrenner (1975-1981) &#171; Buhner Dot Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.buhner.com/?p=1219#comment-5767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to produce at the same level as they performed previously, not better. I talk more about it here, using big words like [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to produce at the same level as they performed previously, not better. I talk more about it here, using big words like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
